<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 416 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to estimate income at specific rates for different types of contracts. It upheld the allowance of remuneration, interest on capital, and depreciation, except for depreciation, which was deemed to have been already considered in estimating income. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reassessment in line with previous Tribunal decisions, with specific directions on the treatment of income components.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:36:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 416 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to estimate income at specific rates for different types of contracts. It upheld the allowance of remuneration, interest on capital, and depreciation, except for depreciation, which was deemed to have been already considered in estimating income. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reassessment in line with previous Tribunal decisions, with specific directions on the treatment of income components.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>