<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 411 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240746</link>
    <description>The CIT(A) directed the AO to delete the disallowance of 20% of site development expenses and deleted disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) for various expenses. However, the CIT(A) added an amount to the income of the assessee due to a discrepancy in the cost of land. The Tribunal set aside the appeal for statistical purposes, instructing a reexamination of the land cost based on impounded documents and partner statements. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 411 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240746</link>
      <description>The CIT(A) directed the AO to delete the disallowance of 20% of site development expenses and deleted disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) for various expenses. However, the CIT(A) added an amount to the income of the assessee due to a discrepancy in the cost of land. The Tribunal set aside the appeal for statistical purposes, instructing a reexamination of the land cost based on impounded documents and partner statements. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>