https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=12076 Coal India Limited and certain subsidiaries were found to hold dominant position in the non coking coal market and to have abused that dominance by imposing unfair, discriminatory terms in Fuel Supply Agreements-notably biased sampling and testing procedures, charging buyers for transportation and ungraded coal expenses, and capping compensation for stones. The Commission directed a cease and desist, monetary penalty, mandated modification of FSAs to remove discriminatory clauses, and required stakeholder consultation and parity between different classes of power producers in implementing changes. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:20:47 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:20:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=12076 Coal India Limited and certain subsidiaries were found to hold dominant position in the non coking coal market and to have abused that dominance by imposing unfair, discriminatory terms in Fuel Supply Agreements-notably biased sampling and testing procedures, charging buyers for transportation and ungraded coal expenses, and capping compensation for stones. The Commission directed a cease and desist, monetary penalty, mandated modification of FSAs to remove discriminatory clauses, and required stakeholder consultation and parity between different classes of power producers in implementing changes. News - Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:20:47 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=12076