<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 429 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160146</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 19(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 cannot be sustained on an audit report alone where it reflects only a different view on the same facts already examined at the original assessment stage. In the absence of fresh material or external information, a mere change of opinion does not constitute the statutory basis required to reopen a completed assessment. On that reasoning, the reassessment was invalid and the reassessment and revisional orders were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:56:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 429 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160146</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 19(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 cannot be sustained on an audit report alone where it reflects only a different view on the same facts already examined at the original assessment stage. In the absence of fresh material or external information, a mere change of opinion does not constitute the statutory basis required to reopen a completed assessment. On that reasoning, the reassessment was invalid and the reassessment and revisional orders were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>