https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160142 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing respondent No. 1 to reassess the case considering the valid no objection certificate and manufacturing timeline. The Court emphasized the prolonged inaction by respondent No. 1 and instructed a reevaluation, leading to the issuance of the eligibility certificate or a reasoned order by a specified date in 2000. The judgment underscored the significance of timely and fair assessment based on the possession of required certificates and the period of manufacturing activity for eligibility under the Sales Tax Incentive Scheme for Industries, 1986. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:39:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160142 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing respondent No. 1 to reassess the case considering the valid no objection certificate and manufacturing timeline. The Court emphasized the prolonged inaction by respondent No. 1 and instructed a reevaluation, leading to the issuance of the eligibility certificate or a reasoned order by a specified date in 2000. The judgment underscored the significance of timely and fair assessment based on the possession of required certificates and the period of manufacturing activity for eligibility under the Sales Tax Incentive Scheme for Industries, 1986. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160142