<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 948 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160139</link>
    <description>A revenue appeal before the Tax Board was not rendered infructuous merely because fresh assessment orders were passed after appellate remand. The appellate authority had already determined the nature of the transaction and remitted the matter for fresh assessment, so the later orders were only consequential and did not independently resolve the dispute raised by the Revenue. The Revenue therefore retained the right to challenge the adverse finding on merits, and the appeals could not be dismissed as infructuous on that basis. The Board was held to have erred in rejecting the appeals, and the matter required reconsideration on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 948 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160139</link>
      <description>A revenue appeal before the Tax Board was not rendered infructuous merely because fresh assessment orders were passed after appellate remand. The appellate authority had already determined the nature of the transaction and remitted the matter for fresh assessment, so the later orders were only consequential and did not independently resolve the dispute raised by the Revenue. The Revenue therefore retained the right to challenge the adverse finding on merits, and the appeals could not be dismissed as infructuous on that basis. The Board was held to have erred in rejecting the appeals, and the matter required reconsideration on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>