<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 833 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160127</link>
    <description>For exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the assessee had to be the actual exporter in substance; where goods were sold to export houses for consideration and the export houses completed the foreign sale, the assessee was not the direct exporter and the related purchases were taxable at the last purchase point. On the separate issue of processing loss, natural wastage in prawns and the difference between purchase weight and export weight were not automatically taxable, and tax was not fastened on the alleged wastage at the purchase point. The result was mixed, with the Revenue succeeding on the exemption issue and the assessee obtaining limited relief on wastage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:16:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 833 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160127</link>
      <description>For exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the assessee had to be the actual exporter in substance; where goods were sold to export houses for consideration and the export houses completed the foreign sale, the assessee was not the direct exporter and the related purchases were taxable at the last purchase point. On the separate issue of processing loss, natural wastage in prawns and the difference between purchase weight and export weight were not automatically taxable, and tax was not fastened on the alleged wastage at the purchase point. The result was mixed, with the Revenue succeeding on the exemption issue and the assessee obtaining limited relief on wastage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>