<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160122</link>
    <description>The judgment emphasizes the importance of upholding the separation of powers between the judiciary and legislature, highlighting the judiciary&#039;s role through judicial review to ensure legislative and executive actions comply with constitutional limits. It clarifies that courts can declare statutes unconstitutional but cannot delve into legislative motives. High Courts cannot direct legislation but supervise within recognized bounds. The judgment warns against courts assuming a legislative role and emphasizes striking down discriminatory provisions rather than directing lawmaking. Overall, it stresses a balanced approach to judicial intervention while respecting constitutional principles and the rule of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160122</link>
      <description>The judgment emphasizes the importance of upholding the separation of powers between the judiciary and legislature, highlighting the judiciary&#039;s role through judicial review to ensure legislative and executive actions comply with constitutional limits. It clarifies that courts can declare statutes unconstitutional but cannot delve into legislative motives. High Courts cannot direct legislation but supervise within recognized bounds. The judgment warns against courts assuming a legislative role and emphasizes striking down discriminatory provisions rather than directing lawmaking. Overall, it stresses a balanced approach to judicial intervention while respecting constitutional principles and the rule of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>