<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 577 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160121</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC held that a notice under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, served on the assessee beyond one year from the relevant previous year, was not time-barred due to a retrospective proviso. The case was remanded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for a hearing on merits, with the parties directed to appear for further directions on 6-8-2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 577 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160121</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC held that a notice under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, served on the assessee beyond one year from the relevant previous year, was not time-barred due to a retrospective proviso. The case was remanded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for a hearing on merits, with the parties directed to appear for further directions on 6-8-2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>