https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240719 The appellant's appeal was rejected by the judge as the denial of CENVAT credit on various grounds was upheld. The judge supported the denial of credit for equipment purchase not related to services, invoices in a different company's name, security services at non-registered premises, unclear nature of services on invoices, and services related to movers and packers. The judgment was pronounced on 03.12.2013. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240719 The appellant's appeal was rejected by the judge as the denial of CENVAT credit on various grounds was upheld. The judge supported the denial of credit for equipment purchase not related to services, invoices in a different company's name, security services at non-registered premises, unclear nature of services on invoices, and services related to movers and packers. The judgment was pronounced on 03.12.2013. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240719