<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240718</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants concerning the demands for repair and maintenance during the warranty period and for providing banking and financial services. The demand for authorized service station services was settled with a partial admission of liability and a deposit requirement. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of each issue, considering legal provisions and evidence, resulting in a balanced outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240718</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants concerning the demands for repair and maintenance during the warranty period and for providing banking and financial services. The demand for authorized service station services was settled with a partial admission of liability and a deposit requirement. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of each issue, considering legal provisions and evidence, resulting in a balanced outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>