<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment under section 147. The reopening of the assessment was deemed void ab initio due to the absence of failure by the assessee to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the entire assessment order was quashed, with the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, based on additions, was dismissed following the quashing of the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment under section 147. The reopening of the assessment was deemed void ab initio due to the absence of failure by the assessee to disclose all material facts. Consequently, the entire assessment order was quashed, with the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, based on additions, was dismissed following the quashing of the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>