<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 355 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of depreciation on dredgers, holding that the assessee was not the owner of the dredgers and therefore not entitled to claim depreciation. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deductions for hire charges, citing lack of evidence and non-compliance with tax deduction at source provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 355 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of depreciation on dredgers, holding that the assessee was not the owner of the dredgers and therefore not entitled to claim depreciation. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deductions for hire charges, citing lack of evidence and non-compliance with tax deduction at source provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>