<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 352 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the applicant by waiving the pre-deposit of interest and penalty during the appeal process. The decision was based on the lack of evidence showing the applicant&#039;s connivance with the company that fraudulently obtained the DEPB Scrip. Despite the duty liability admitted and paid by the company, no direct involvement of the applicant in the fraudulent activities was found, leading to the Tribunal deeming the penalty imposition unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:00:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 352 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the applicant by waiving the pre-deposit of interest and penalty during the appeal process. The decision was based on the lack of evidence showing the applicant&#039;s connivance with the company that fraudulently obtained the DEPB Scrip. Despite the duty liability admitted and paid by the company, no direct involvement of the applicant in the fraudulent activities was found, leading to the Tribunal deeming the penalty imposition unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>