<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 346 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing appeals under Section 35B(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite a significant delay attributed to various reasons, including reliance on previous Tribunal decisions and technical issues, the Tribunal found no gross negligence or deliberate inaction by the applicant. Emphasizing a liberal approach to condone delays and ensuring justice, the Tribunal excused the delay, allowing the appeals to proceed for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 346 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing appeals under Section 35B(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite a significant delay attributed to various reasons, including reliance on previous Tribunal decisions and technical issues, the Tribunal found no gross negligence or deliberate inaction by the applicant. Emphasizing a liberal approach to condone delays and ensuring justice, the Tribunal excused the delay, allowing the appeals to proceed for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>