<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 343 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration application filed by M/s Kisan Gramodyog Sansthan after failing to comply with a deposit order, resulting in the dismissal of their appeal by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal held that once the High Court and Supreme Court upheld the dismissal, it lacked the authority to entertain restoration applications. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal concluded it was functus officio and advised the appellant to approach the Supreme Court for any challenge to the dismissal order. Compliance with deposit orders was emphasized, with restoration options limited once higher courts affirm dismissal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:56:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 343 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration application filed by M/s Kisan Gramodyog Sansthan after failing to comply with a deposit order, resulting in the dismissal of their appeal by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal held that once the High Court and Supreme Court upheld the dismissal, it lacked the authority to entertain restoration applications. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal concluded it was functus officio and advised the appellant to approach the Supreme Court for any challenge to the dismissal order. Compliance with deposit orders was emphasized, with restoration options limited once higher courts affirm dismissal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>