<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 339 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240674</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the penal provisions under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could not be applied as the appellant was a job worker for M/s. Raj Auto Industries and had not received any demand of duty. The tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s prima facie case and staying the recovery of the penalty until the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 339 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240674</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the penal provisions under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could not be applied as the appellant was a job worker for M/s. Raj Auto Industries and had not received any demand of duty. The tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s prima facie case and staying the recovery of the penalty until the appeal&#039;s disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>