<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 641 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160118</link>
    <description>Purchases of plant, equipment and materials from suppliers outside West Bengal were treated as distinct from the taxable deemed sale arising when the contractor transferred property in those goods during execution of a turnkey works contract. Because the contractor had separate purchase contracts with outside-State vendors, the inter-State movement ended on delivery to the contractor, and the later incorporation of the goods into the works contract was the relevant taxable event under article 366(29A)(b) and section 6D of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Claims for deduction based on alleged linkage between sub-vendors and the contractee failed, as there was no privity of contract between them and the contractee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 641 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160118</link>
      <description>Purchases of plant, equipment and materials from suppliers outside West Bengal were treated as distinct from the taxable deemed sale arising when the contractor transferred property in those goods during execution of a turnkey works contract. Because the contractor had separate purchase contracts with outside-State vendors, the inter-State movement ended on delivery to the contractor, and the later incorporation of the goods into the works contract was the relevant taxable event under article 366(29A)(b) and section 6D of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. Claims for deduction based on alleged linkage between sub-vendors and the contractee failed, as there was no privity of contract between them and the contractee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>