<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 640 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of Ayurvedic Cool Banphool Oil as hair oil, taxable at 8%, dismissing the application. It emphasized that a drug license is not conclusive evidence for tax purposes and found the evidence provided insufficient to classify the product as an ayurvedic medicine. The application was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 17:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 640 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of Ayurvedic Cool Banphool Oil as hair oil, taxable at 8%, dismissing the application. It emphasized that a drug license is not conclusive evidence for tax purposes and found the evidence provided insufficient to classify the product as an ayurvedic medicine. The application was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>