<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 795 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160105</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan HC dismissed a revision petition against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s order. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the tax rate dispute, ruling that the sale was not to an unregistered dealer as the buyer registered before acquiring the goods. The revision petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 17:25:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 795 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160105</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan HC dismissed a revision petition against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s order. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the tax rate dispute, ruling that the sale was not to an unregistered dealer as the buyer registered before acquiring the goods. The revision petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>