<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (12) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal had jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte award based on procedural defects, not a review on merits. The Tribunal retained jurisdiction beyond 30 days from the award&#039;s publication to decide the application on its merits. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s authority to set aside the award and continue proceedings to ensure justice and procedural fairness in industrial dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (12) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal had jurisdiction to set aside the ex parte award based on procedural defects, not a review on merits. The Tribunal retained jurisdiction beyond 30 days from the award&#039;s publication to decide the application on its merits. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s authority to set aside the award and continue proceedings to ensure justice and procedural fairness in industrial dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>