<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 917 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160078</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that freight charges, even when charged separately, are part of the taxable turnover due to the overriding effect of the Cement Control Order. However, the Court set aside the orders regarding interest on delayed tax payment, ruling that the revisionist was not liable to pay interest under the U.P. Sales Tax Act due to their bona fide belief and the lack of clarity surrounding the interpretation of the Control Order before the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. The revisions were partly allowed in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:53:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 917 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160078</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that freight charges, even when charged separately, are part of the taxable turnover due to the overriding effect of the Cement Control Order. However, the Court set aside the orders regarding interest on delayed tax payment, ruling that the revisionist was not liable to pay interest under the U.P. Sales Tax Act due to their bona fide belief and the lack of clarity surrounding the interpretation of the Control Order before the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling. The revisions were partly allowed in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>