<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 833 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160069</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment notices issued under Section 44 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, were without jurisdiction, time-barred, and based on unfounded allegations of concealment. The notices were quashed, and the petitions were allowed with costs. The court reiterated that the conditions precedent for issuing reassessment notices were not satisfied, making the notices illegal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 18:27:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 833 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160069</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment notices issued under Section 44 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, were without jurisdiction, time-barred, and based on unfounded allegations of concealment. The notices were quashed, and the petitions were allowed with costs. The court reiterated that the conditions precedent for issuing reassessment notices were not satisfied, making the notices illegal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>