https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160068 The court upheld the Sales Tax Tribunal's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against the Assistant Commissioner's order. The petitioner failed to prove that their counsel was unauthorized to receive the order, as the counsel could act as an agent per the terms of the vakalatnama. Consequently, the court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2013 18:25:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160068 The court upheld the Sales Tax Tribunal's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against the Assistant Commissioner's order. The petitioner failed to prove that their counsel was unauthorized to receive the order, as the counsel could act as an agent per the terms of the vakalatnama. Consequently, the court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160068