<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 561 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160064</link>
    <description>Remission under section 41 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 required manufacture in a newly set up industrial unit and strict compliance with the prescribed record-keeping rules. The finishing activity relied on by the applicant did not change the name, character or use of the goods, and the evidence showed that ingots were converted into bars outside the unit; the rolled bars were therefore not manufactured in the applicant&#039;s own unit, so the remission claim failed. Because the unit did not satisfy the manufacturing condition, separate accounts, sale documents and stock registers were required, and the failure to maintain or produce them amounted to violation of rule 151(2)(a), (b) and (d).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 18:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 561 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160064</link>
      <description>Remission under section 41 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 required manufacture in a newly set up industrial unit and strict compliance with the prescribed record-keeping rules. The finishing activity relied on by the applicant did not change the name, character or use of the goods, and the evidence showed that ingots were converted into bars outside the unit; the rolled bars were therefore not manufactured in the applicant&#039;s own unit, so the remission claim failed. Because the unit did not satisfy the manufacturing condition, separate accounts, sale documents and stock registers were required, and the failure to maintain or produce them amounted to violation of rule 151(2)(a), (b) and (d).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>