<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 322 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240657</link>
    <description>Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted where the assessee showed a strong prima facie case against service tax and penalty on GTA services used for inward and outward transportation. For inward freight on FOR destination supplies, the supplier could not be treated as the assessee&#039;s agent, so liability was not established at the stay stage. For outward freight, the dispute was covered by Tribunal precedent supporting the assessee. On that basis, the conditional pre-deposit was waived and stay was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 322 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240657</link>
      <description>Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted where the assessee showed a strong prima facie case against service tax and penalty on GTA services used for inward and outward transportation. For inward freight on FOR destination supplies, the supplier could not be treated as the assessee&#039;s agent, so liability was not established at the stay stage. For outward freight, the dispute was covered by Tribunal precedent supporting the assessee. On that basis, the conditional pre-deposit was waived and stay was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>