<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 311 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240646</link>
    <description>Depreciation remains allowable for a charitable institution computing real income, even where the asset cost was earlier treated as application of income. The Madhya Pradesh High Court followed settled High Court authority that such treatment does not create impermissible double deduction, because depreciation is a necessary charge in income computation. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected and the assessee&#039;s depreciation claim was left intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 311 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240646</link>
      <description>Depreciation remains allowable for a charitable institution computing real income, even where the asset cost was earlier treated as application of income. The Madhya Pradesh High Court followed settled High Court authority that such treatment does not create impermissible double deduction, because depreciation is a necessary charge in income computation. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected and the assessee&#039;s depreciation claim was left intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>