<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 306 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions, emphasizing the need to establish not only the identity of the parties but also the genuineness of the transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:26:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 306 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions, emphasizing the need to establish not only the identity of the parties but also the genuineness of the transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>