<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 292 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240627</link>
    <description>Duty-free import of gift commodities under Notification No. 148/94-Cus. was available where the importer produced the requisite registration certificate showing it was a registered donee organisation and satisfied the condition of distribution to the poor and needy. The notification was treated as requiring registration for free distribution, and the earlier absence of the certificate was not a valid basis to deny exemption once the certificate was produced on record. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:25:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 292 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240627</link>
      <description>Duty-free import of gift commodities under Notification No. 148/94-Cus. was available where the importer produced the requisite registration certificate showing it was a registered donee organisation and satisfied the condition of distribution to the poor and needy. The notification was treated as requiring registration for free distribution, and the earlier absence of the certificate was not a valid basis to deny exemption once the certificate was produced on record. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>