<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 284 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240619</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the demand of interest within the one-year limitation period, directing the appellant to calculate and pay the interest liability within 30 days. The tribunal set aside the demand of interest beyond one year, citing legal precedent and relevant provisions. The appeal was disposed of based on the findings related to the demand of interest within the prescribed limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 284 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240619</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the demand of interest within the one-year limitation period, directing the appellant to calculate and pay the interest liability within 30 days. The tribunal set aside the demand of interest beyond one year, citing legal precedent and relevant provisions. The appeal was disposed of based on the findings related to the demand of interest within the prescribed limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>