<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 283 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT credit on iron and steel items used in the fabrication of platforms within the factory. The appellant&#039;s attempt to avail credit under different categories was deemed improper, indicating a disregard for the law. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit the wrongly taken credit amount with interest within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in recovery proceedings. The decision was based on the lack of merit in the appellant&#039;s case and the absence of demonstrated financial hardship, aligning with the principle of upholding the balance of convenience.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:24:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 283 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT credit on iron and steel items used in the fabrication of platforms within the factory. The appellant&#039;s attempt to avail credit under different categories was deemed improper, indicating a disregard for the law. The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit the wrongly taken credit amount with interest within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in recovery proceedings. The decision was based on the lack of merit in the appellant&#039;s case and the absence of demonstrated financial hardship, aligning with the principle of upholding the balance of convenience.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>