<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 276 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240611</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeals of the appellants, who were engaged in sugar and molasses manufacturing, regarding the remission of duty for molasses stored in steel tanks. The Tribunal found that the losses were below 2% and were attributed to factors like evaporation and handling, in line with the Central Board of Excise and Customs&#039; instructions allowing storage losses of up to 2%. The Commissioner failed to justify disregarding these instructions, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned orders and granting relief to the appellants based on established instructions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 276 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240611</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeals of the appellants, who were engaged in sugar and molasses manufacturing, regarding the remission of duty for molasses stored in steel tanks. The Tribunal found that the losses were below 2% and were attributed to factors like evaporation and handling, in line with the Central Board of Excise and Customs&#039; instructions allowing storage losses of up to 2%. The Commissioner failed to justify disregarding these instructions, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned orders and granting relief to the appellants based on established instructions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>