<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 831 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160040</link>
    <description>Royalty and dead rent payable under statutory mining lease deeds were characterised by the HC as payments under the lease scheme rather than consideration for a sale of minerals. Royalty was linked to minerals actually extracted, while dead rent was a fixed sum payable regardless of extraction; on that basis, neither amount constituted taxable sale consideration. Sales tax was therefore held not leviable on either royalty or dead rent, and the petitioners succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 831 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160040</link>
      <description>Royalty and dead rent payable under statutory mining lease deeds were characterised by the HC as payments under the lease scheme rather than consideration for a sale of minerals. Royalty was linked to minerals actually extracted, while dead rent was a fixed sum payable regardless of extraction; on that basis, neither amount constituted taxable sale consideration. Sales tax was therefore held not leviable on either royalty or dead rent, and the petitioners succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>