<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 578 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160030</link>
    <description>An undefined taxing expression in a concessional purchase tax notification was construed in its ordinary commercial sense, so cotton yarn produced by spinning was treated as &quot;textile&quot; and the unit qualified as a textile mill. The notification&#039;s object of encouraging use of cotton grown in the State supported a broader reading rather than a narrow exclusion of spinning units. The temporal condition was also satisfied because establishment of the company or dealer registration was not the same as establishment of the mill; machinery installation and commencement of production occurred within the relevant period. Alleged consignment-based despatches did not defeat the concession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 578 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160030</link>
      <description>An undefined taxing expression in a concessional purchase tax notification was construed in its ordinary commercial sense, so cotton yarn produced by spinning was treated as &quot;textile&quot; and the unit qualified as a textile mill. The notification&#039;s object of encouraging use of cotton grown in the State supported a broader reading rather than a narrow exclusion of spinning units. The temporal condition was also satisfied because establishment of the company or dealer registration was not the same as establishment of the mill; machinery installation and commencement of production occurred within the relevant period. Alleged consignment-based despatches did not defeat the concession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>