<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 258 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160022</link>
    <description>Duty-paid plastic caps fitted to aluminium collapsible tubes were not includible in the assessable weight of the tubes under Item 27 of the Central Excise Tariff. The caps retained their independent identity as plastic components, and mere attachment to the tube did not make them part of the aluminium container or convert their character. The tariff entry could not be expanded to treat separate plastic caps as part of the container, and Explanation (2) was inapplicable because the case did not involve alloy or mixed-metal composition. Accordingly, the weight of the caps was excluded from assessment and the duty demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 11:16:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 258 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160022</link>
      <description>Duty-paid plastic caps fitted to aluminium collapsible tubes were not includible in the assessable weight of the tubes under Item 27 of the Central Excise Tariff. The caps retained their independent identity as plastic components, and mere attachment to the tube did not make them part of the aluminium container or convert their character. The tariff entry could not be expanded to treat separate plastic caps as part of the container, and Explanation (2) was inapplicable because the case did not involve alloy or mixed-metal composition. Accordingly, the weight of the caps was excluded from assessment and the duty demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>