https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160021 A statutory vacancy in the Appellate Tribunal was required to be filled expeditiously under the Delhi Sales-tax Act, and the administrative memorandum was treated as supporting that object. Where an approved select panel remained operative and the appellant was the only other recommended candidate after the first appointee left office, the appointing authority could not ignore the panel and begin a fresh selection without a justifiable reason. Such unexplained departure from the approved procedure was treated as arbitrary State action and inconsistent with Article 14. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160021 A statutory vacancy in the Appellate Tribunal was required to be filled expeditiously under the Delhi Sales-tax Act, and the administrative memorandum was treated as supporting that object. Where an approved select panel remained operative and the appellant was the only other recommended candidate after the first appointee left office, the appointing authority could not ignore the panel and begin a fresh selection without a justifiable reason. Such unexplained departure from the approved procedure was treated as arbitrary State action and inconsistent with Article 14. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 16 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160021