<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 273 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240608</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined because the taxing statute provided a complete appellate remedy that was functioning, and the dispute turned on disputed facts concerning stock transfers, consignment documents and alleged suppression. Where an effective statutory appeal exists, the rule of alternative remedy ordinarily bars a writ petition from bypassing that mechanism, particularly when factual examination is required. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable and were dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 08:05:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 273 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240608</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined because the taxing statute provided a complete appellate remedy that was functioning, and the dispute turned on disputed facts concerning stock transfers, consignment documents and alleged suppression. Where an effective statutory appeal exists, the rule of alternative remedy ordinarily bars a writ petition from bypassing that mechanism, particularly when factual examination is required. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable and were dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>