<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted total waiver of pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of Service Tax and penalty amounting to Rs.37.57 Lakhs imposed on a Customs House Agent. This decision was based on the invalidation of Rule 5(1) of the Valuation Rules by the Delhi High Court, which rendered the demand unsustainable. The Tribunal considered the applicant&#039;s prima facie case in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling, leading to the favorable outcome of granting the waiver and stay on recovery during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 08:05:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted total waiver of pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of Service Tax and penalty amounting to Rs.37.57 Lakhs imposed on a Customs House Agent. This decision was based on the invalidation of Rule 5(1) of the Valuation Rules by the Delhi High Court, which rendered the demand unsustainable. The Tribunal considered the applicant&#039;s prima facie case in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling, leading to the favorable outcome of granting the waiver and stay on recovery during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>