https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240561 The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, allowing the appeal to proceed. The court upheld the requirement for separate appeals for multiple adjudication orders. The monetary limit for filing central excise appeals was confirmed unless constitutional validity or specific circumstances were challenged. The appellant was granted cash refund for deemed export based on a previous judgment. The court limited the appeal to a specific judgment, addressing issues on deemed exports and time limits for refund claims. The appeal was dismissed due to not meeting the monetary limit and specific circumstances, without considering the merits of the questions raised. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240561 The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, allowing the appeal to proceed. The court upheld the requirement for separate appeals for multiple adjudication orders. The monetary limit for filing central excise appeals was confirmed unless constitutional validity or specific circumstances were challenged. The appellant was granted cash refund for deemed export based on a previous judgment. The court limited the appeal to a specific judgment, addressing issues on deemed exports and time limits for refund claims. The appeal was dismissed due to not meeting the monetary limit and specific circumstances, without considering the merits of the questions raised. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240561