https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160020 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed under the Haryana General Sales Tax framework, and the petitioners had not yet suffered any adverse final assessment order. The earlier administrative instructions relied on by the petitioners had been withdrawn, so there was no continuing basis to assume the assessing authority would not act independently. In these circumstances, the objections could first be examined by the assessing authority, with statutory appeals available thereafter. The petitions were therefore held to be premature and not maintainable at that stage. en-us Fri, 16 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:50:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160020 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed under the Haryana General Sales Tax framework, and the petitioners had not yet suffered any adverse final assessment order. The earlier administrative instructions relied on by the petitioners had been withdrawn, so there was no continuing basis to assume the assessing authority would not act independently. In these circumstances, the objections could first be examined by the assessing authority, with statutory appeals available thereafter. The petitions were therefore held to be premature and not maintainable at that stage. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 16 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160020