<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 377 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160008</link>
    <description>Section 14 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 limited appeals to the Tribunal to orders specifically covered by the statute, including orders passed by the Commissioner under section 12-A or section 15-A, or appellate orders disposing of appeals from specified orders. An order of the Deputy Commissioner (Administration) was not an appealable order under that framework, because he was not an appellate authority within section 2(a) and the relevant exemption notification did not authorise him to decide the matter in the first instance. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against that order, and the revision was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 17:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 377 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160008</link>
      <description>Section 14 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 limited appeals to the Tribunal to orders specifically covered by the statute, including orders passed by the Commissioner under section 12-A or section 15-A, or appellate orders disposing of appeals from specified orders. An order of the Deputy Commissioner (Administration) was not an appealable order under that framework, because he was not an appellate authority within section 2(a) and the relevant exemption notification did not authorise him to decide the matter in the first instance. The Tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against that order, and the revision was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>