<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 635 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160004</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 was held to confer only limited administrative power: the Government could remove difficulties, while the Commissioner could issue administrative instructions, but neither could issue a binding executive interpretation of schedule entries for assessing authorities. Assessing, appellate and revisional authorities remained bound to interpret the Act independently, so the government clarification was ultra vires and the consequential commissioner&#039;s order could not stand. On the tax entry question, item 24B was confined to refined vegetable oils derived from non-refined oils falling under item 24A, and imported refined oils not satisfying that description could not be included by interpretation. The concessional 2% rate was therefore unavailable, and the oils remained taxable at 10%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 635 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160004</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 was held to confer only limited administrative power: the Government could remove difficulties, while the Commissioner could issue administrative instructions, but neither could issue a binding executive interpretation of schedule entries for assessing authorities. Assessing, appellate and revisional authorities remained bound to interpret the Act independently, so the government clarification was ultra vires and the consequential commissioner&#039;s order could not stand. On the tax entry question, item 24B was confined to refined vegetable oils derived from non-refined oils falling under item 24A, and imported refined oils not satisfying that description could not be included by interpretation. The concessional 2% rate was therefore unavailable, and the oils remained taxable at 10%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>