<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 633 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160001</link>
    <description>A trade mark licence for royalty, without transfer of ownership or any proprietary interest, is treated as a transfer of the right to use goods under the Maharashtra sales tax statute. The analysis distinguishes assignment from licence: assignment divests title, while a licence permits use for consideration. It also notes that for trade marks, physical delivery or exclusive possession is not necessary, because the taxable event is the transfer of the user-right itself. Concurrent use by more than one person does not remove the transaction from the levy, and the inclusion of trade marks in the statutory Schedule supports taxability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:29:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 633 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160001</link>
      <description>A trade mark licence for royalty, without transfer of ownership or any proprietary interest, is treated as a transfer of the right to use goods under the Maharashtra sales tax statute. The analysis distinguishes assignment from licence: assignment divests title, while a licence permits use for consideration. It also notes that for trade marks, physical delivery or exclusive possession is not necessary, because the taxable event is the transfer of the user-right itself. Concurrent use by more than one person does not remove the transaction from the levy, and the inclusion of trade marks in the statutory Schedule supports taxability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>