<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 570 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159998</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 12(3) could not be levied on turnover later disclosed in a revised return, because the revised disclosure removed that portion from the category of suppressed turnover. However, penalty remained sustainable on turnover independently estimated by the assessing authority in a best judgment assessment, where that estimated cash-sale suppression was still not disclosed in the revised return. The penalty was therefore confined to the undisclosed estimated turnover alone, and restricted to 50 per cent of that amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 570 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159998</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 12(3) could not be levied on turnover later disclosed in a revised return, because the revised disclosure removed that portion from the category of suppressed turnover. However, penalty remained sustainable on turnover independently estimated by the assessing authority in a best judgment assessment, where that estimated cash-sale suppression was still not disclosed in the revised return. The penalty was therefore confined to the undisclosed estimated turnover alone, and restricted to 50 per cent of that amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>