<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 630 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159984</link>
    <description>Where a sales tax statute does not define a classification term, its meaning is taken from common parlance. In ordinary usage, &quot;utensil&quot; denotes an implement used in domestic, especially kitchen or religious, contexts, so aluminium school bags do not fit the description of household utensils under entry 7. They are properly treated as aluminium products falling under entry 8. The classification was therefore decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:20:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 630 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159984</link>
      <description>Where a sales tax statute does not define a classification term, its meaning is taken from common parlance. In ordinary usage, &quot;utensil&quot; denotes an implement used in domestic, especially kitchen or religious, contexts, so aluminium school bags do not fit the description of household utensils under entry 7. They are properly treated as aluminium products falling under entry 8. The classification was therefore decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>