<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 670 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159965</link>
    <description>Timber in transit under the Kerala General Sales Tax framework could not be detained at a check-post merely for absence of prescribed transport documents where the available records showed payment of tax. Detention is sustainable only when the missing statutory papers, such as the bill of sale, delivery note, certificate of ownership, or required declaration, indicate possible tax evasion. A technical defect in documentation, without any element of evasion, is insufficient to justify coercive restraint. On that basis, the apprehension of detention was found unfounded and transport supported by the requisite forest department and sale documents was treated as unobjectionable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 670 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159965</link>
      <description>Timber in transit under the Kerala General Sales Tax framework could not be detained at a check-post merely for absence of prescribed transport documents where the available records showed payment of tax. Detention is sustainable only when the missing statutory papers, such as the bill of sale, delivery note, certificate of ownership, or required declaration, indicate possible tax evasion. A technical defect in documentation, without any element of evasion, is insufficient to justify coercive restraint. On that basis, the apprehension of detention was found unfounded and transport supported by the requisite forest department and sale documents was treated as unobjectionable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>