<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 212 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240547</link>
    <description>The appellate judge partially allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim for cenvat credit on input services, granting refund for essential services like tour operator and rent-a-cab. Denial of refund for services related to software exports was overturned, emphasizing the eligibility of business-related services for refund. The judge required verification of invoices for refund claims on event management, public relations, and consultancy services. Cenvat credit denial was addressed, with relief granted for invoices with minor discrepancies but inadmissibility for those lacking details. The matter was remitted for further verification to ascertain the refund amount, ensuring compliance with procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 212 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240547</link>
      <description>The appellate judge partially allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim for cenvat credit on input services, granting refund for essential services like tour operator and rent-a-cab. Denial of refund for services related to software exports was overturned, emphasizing the eligibility of business-related services for refund. The judge required verification of invoices for refund claims on event management, public relations, and consultancy services. Cenvat credit denial was addressed, with relief granted for invoices with minor discrepancies but inadmissibility for those lacking details. The matter was remitted for further verification to ascertain the refund amount, ensuring compliance with procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>