<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 201 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240536</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) against the appellant-assessee for the assessment year 1998-99, based on findings of concealment and furnishing inaccurate income details. The judgment emphasized legal principles governing penalty imposition and the Assessing Officer&#039;s discretion in initiating penalty proceedings during assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 201 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240536</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) against the appellant-assessee for the assessment year 1998-99, based on findings of concealment and furnishing inaccurate income details. The judgment emphasized legal principles governing penalty imposition and the Assessing Officer&#039;s discretion in initiating penalty proceedings during assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>