<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 195 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240530</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, ruling in favor of the revenue on the valuation of closing stock issue but in favor of the assessee on the treatment of pre-operative expenses. The closing stock addition was reinstated, while the pre-operative expenses were deemed revenue expenditure due to the lack of an enduring benefit from the project. The Court disposed of the appeal without cost orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 195 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240530</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, ruling in favor of the revenue on the valuation of closing stock issue but in favor of the assessee on the treatment of pre-operative expenses. The closing stock addition was reinstated, while the pre-operative expenses were deemed revenue expenditure due to the lack of an enduring benefit from the project. The Court disposed of the appeal without cost orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>