<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 192 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240527</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the findings of the CIT(A) and the AO that the claim for deduction under section 80IA was not valid due to the transfer of previously used machinery, thus violating section 80IA(3) of the Income Tax Act. The issue concerning the rate credited by the Tamilnadu Electricity Board was deemed irrelevant following the dismissal of the primary claim. The appeal was concluded on 04/01/2013 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 192 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240527</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the findings of the CIT(A) and the AO that the claim for deduction under section 80IA was not valid due to the transfer of previously used machinery, thus violating section 80IA(3) of the Income Tax Act. The issue concerning the rate credited by the Tamilnadu Electricity Board was deemed irrelevant following the dismissal of the primary claim. The appeal was concluded on 04/01/2013 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>